I have run a Merch on Demand account since early 2023, back when the pitch was simple: upload designs, let Amazon search traffic do the rest, collect royalties. That pitch is dead as of June 1, 2026. Amazon restructured the royalty model so that organic-traffic sellers now earn roughly half of what they used to, and the sellers making real money are the ones pushing their own audience at the listings. The tool is still the cheapest distribution on the internet for a design that sells. It is just no longer a passive-income slot machine.

The Money Angle

Four ways this actually pays, in order of what most sellers should chase:

What It Really Costs

There are no fees, but the structural costs are real and they compound:

CostReality
ApplicationInvite-only, waitlist runs 2-8 weeks (sometimes months), rejection means a 60-day reapply wait
Starting slotsTier 10 - exactly 10 live designs. Tier 25 reportedly needs 10 sales, Tier 100 needs 25, Tier 500 needs 100; expect 4-12 months to reach Tier 100
Slot utilizationAnalysts report Amazon wants ~80% of current slots filled before considering a tier bump - empty slots stall your climb
Payout lagAbout 60 days after the sale month closes (April sales pay June 30). EFT has no minimum; wire and check need $100
Catalog decayListings with no sale in their first 18 months get auto-deleted; accounts flat for 12 months reportedly face tier downgrade under the trailing-12-month review
The referral cut15% plus production cost come off the top of every sale - the 2026 restructure did not touch this, only how much of what remains reaches you

None of these cost money out of pocket. Together they cost time and they punish the set-and-forget approach that worked from 2017 through 2025.

The AI Design Reality

I checked the current Merch content policies specifically for AI rules, and the finding is stranger than most guides claim: there is no AI disclosure field in the upload flow, no AI checkbox, and no AI-specific upload cap. The throttling everyone feels is the tier ladder itself, which applies identically to hand-drawn and generated work.

That does not mean AI is consequence-free. Three things actually bite:

The workable pattern is AI for layout and lettering drafts, a human pass for composition and substrate checks (dark-garment art is its own job - white ink on black is not a white pixel in your file), and niche phrases no model would spontaneously produce.

vs The Field

Merch on DemandRedbubblePrintify + own store
EntryApplication, invite-onlyFree account, instantFree, but you build/run the store
TrafficAmazon buyers, massiveBuilt-in art browsersAll yours to bring
Your cut on a $19.99 tee$2.44-$5.27 (traffic tier)~50% platform fee for new accounts~$6-9 after all fees
Customer dataNone - Amazon owns everythingNoneFull, with email capture
BrandNone, no storefrontBasic shop pageComplete
Best forTesting designs on Amazon's trafficPassive catalog exposureScaling proven winners

The honest read: Merch pays the worst per sale of the three but touches the largest buyer base, and the external-traffic tiers mean Amazon now pays you extra for doing what Printify sellers do anyway.

Bottom Line

Merch on Demand is worth an application if you treat it as a distribution channel fed by an audience you own somewhere else, or as a zero-risk testing lab before committing to inventory. The Plus and Premium traffic tiers turned the sellers with any kind of following into a favored class overnight, and hoodie economics beat every alternative on a per-upload basis.

Skip it if you are chasing the 2019 version - upload a thousand designs, wait for Amazon search to shower royalties. The June 2026 restructure was built specifically to starve that model, and the 18-month deletion policy cleans up the corpses. Also skip it if you need money inside two months; the 60-day payout lag alone rules that out.